Andrew Klavan begins his “The Great Question” with…
Islamism is the great evil of our age, and the great question of our age is whether this foulness is the natural child of Islam itself or a cancer on its body.
Given the continual, regular atrocities done in the name of Islam (but that we are always told have nothing to do with the “religion of peace”)…
This seems an especially apropos query.
Are the terrorist acts of self-proclaimed Muslims an evil aberration or a natural extension of Islam and its holy book? Were the millions purged in Russia and China in the 20th century a natural child of communism? Is the corruption and complete breakdown of the economy in Venezuala (and resulting chaos) a natural result of socialism?
Was the Inquisition a natural extension of Christianity? How about other evil done in the name of Christ the last 2,000 years?
A very wise man said, “We become like the god we worship.”
And everybody worships a god, whether they realize it or not. I’ll unhesitatingly choose Jesus over Allah, Lenin (or Stalin), Mao, or Chavez (or his weaker replacement Maduro). There is no foulness in Christ nor in the pure faith He founded with His blood on the cross.
Can you say the same of ______? When its followers “become like the god [they] worship,” is the result more love and life or more corruption and carnage?
Another “question of our age” I suppose…
I read a truly disturbing article last night:
“Why German Protestants Will Stop Converting Muslims”
Basically, a draft document for the Protestant Church in Germany nixes the idea of evangelizing Muslims:
The Church does not only categorically rejects the conversion of reform-minded Muslims but outright dismisses all missionary work directed at Muslims.
There is so much wrong in the article you should read the whole thing yourself, but here is the explantion of why the Great Comission (Matthew 28:16-20) doesn’t apply the same way it did the last two millenia: Continue reading Interpreting Away the Great Comission
I suspect it won't be often that I find myself agreeing with militant atheist Richard Dawkins, but after igniting a furor with a comment about Islam, he said something that I think bears repeating:
A statement of simple fact is not bigotry.
(From "Richard Dawkins Muslim jibe sparks Twitter backlash.")
Now, if you always focus on just the negative "simple facts" about a category of people…then that might be an indication of bigotry.
Wondering what Dawkins said that caused people to freak? Continue reading “A statement of simple fact is not bigotry.”
One of the web pages I check on pretty much daily is The Corner at National Review Online. A couple weeks back I ran into the article "You're a Good Man, Cardinal Dolan." Michael Potemra's piece starts off with:
The highly mediagenic archbishop of New York, Timothy Cardinal Dolan, visited a mosque on Staten Island and encouraged the worshipers there to hold on to their faith.
Regardless of whether Islam is a "religion of peace" or not, if you are a Christian who holds on to traditional faith, you probably reacted to that sentence the same way I did.
Not so well…
Although I am an inclusivist (see also here), I cannot reconcile Potemra's opening statement with John 14:6:
Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6, English Standard Version, emphasis mine).
Now, before I judge someone's words I try to read (or hear) them in context, and I clicked through to the news report that was the genesis of Potemra's entry. I could not find the cardinal specificaly encouraging Muslims to hold on to their faith, but in some respects this was even more disturbing:
The cardinal asked questions about the Muslim faith and emphasized throughout his visit how much the two religions and their members have in common.
"You love God, we love God and he is the same God," the cardinal said of the Muslim and Roman Catholic faiths.
Ack! Continue reading Not the Same…